FANDOM


  • This thread is for suggesting new categories and pages that need discussing before creation. You can find the first thread here.

      Preparing Editor Spell
    • The latest discussion is for car pages.

      It has been suggested that the page for Cruella's car is not significant enough, and it has also been suggested that we create a page for David Nolan's truck.

      As compromise, we have the following:

      Eddiefunny wrote:

      I think for cars we should just have a note in the trivia section about which cars they own

      MyPretties wrote: I think that instead of making a page for each and every item seen on the show, a tab should be made on the trivia section of the character pages that says Known Personal Property.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Agree with Known Personal Property (perhaps in infobox?)

      For instance:

      Regina Mills:

      • Mills House
      • Heart Vaul
      • Engagement Ring
      • Apple Tree
      • Book of Spells etc.
        Preparing Editor Spell
    • I wouldn't have a problem with such a thing. (I love list pages anyway, they help us see where we could use an article for something)

      I would suggest it as, for example, "Emma Swan/Property" or "Regina Mills/Property". It's a little cleaner that way, imo, and we can link to these pages in infoboxes for easy location.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • I disagree. First of all, our infoboxes are already big. Killian had to add collapsibles on them to hide some lists (about allies and enemies). Clearly, the infobox is a bad choice to me.

      Then, a list page. I also disagree. We have a lot of list pages. A lot of time, they are not complete. So I don't think it is a good idea.

      The only thing I would agree is the creation of categories. I know some big wikis uses this system and it is pretty clear and easy to read. My first exemple is Harry Potter Wikia. They have, for exemple, a category called: "Harry Potter's possessions". They did that for each important character and it works perfectly. And it does not take place on the wiki so easier to read. They don't have to change all infoboxes or complete some list pages. Just add the categories.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Lady Junky wrote:
      I disagree. First of all, our infoboxes are already big. Killian had to add collapsibles on them to hide some lists (about allies and enemies). Clearly, the infobox is a bad choice to me.

      Then, a list page. I also disagree. We have a lot of list pages. A lot of time, they are not complete. So I don't think it is a good idea.

      The only thing I would agree is the creation of categories. I know some big wikis uses this system and it is pretty clear and easy to read. My first exemple is Harry Potter Wikia. They have, for exemple, a category called: "Harry Potter's possessions". They did that for each important character and it works perfectly. And it does not take place on the wiki so easier to read. They don't have to change all infoboxes or complete some list pages. Just add the categories.

      Wouldn't that require every item to get its own page then though? I thought that's what we were trying to avoid.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • No, you can simply list things on a category similar to what you do with articles.

      If there's an issue with things being incomplete, perhaps we should start a campaign to have more complete pages? (we do have several unfinished recaps, transcripts, history sections, etc as well as lists)

      I think we could establish criteria (or go case by case) for characters who warrant a listing of their property. We could add that as a tab in trivia, as suggested, or create a link in infoboxes where needed (which is what I prefer).

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Utter solitude wrote:
      No, you can simply list things on a category similar to what you do with articles.

      If there's an issue with things being incomplete, perhaps we should start a campaign to have more complete pages? (we do have several unfinished recaps, transcripts, history sections, etc as well as lists)

      I think we could establish criteria (or go case by case) for characters who warrant a listing of their property. We could add that as a tab in trivia, as suggested, or create a link in infoboxes where needed (which is what I prefer).

      Yeah, do we have a list of things that are incomplete? I could probably help with some of it, but it's hard to know what things still need to be worked on.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • I think that the current car pages should stay, and I don't see a problem with adding David's truck as it is, next to the yellow bug, the most featured vehicle. 

      But I disagree with the infobox option as they are already too big (I even think that the allies and enemy section are unnecessary, but that's my opinion). I could accept a list page, but dunno how that would look like. I guess like this (note I'm just listing random things):

      Regina

      • shoes
      • apples
      • potions
      • happiness
      • a lamp
        Preparing Editor Spell
    • What would David's Truck entail?

      "He drove it here in this episode. He drove it in this episode, he drove it in this episode" XD

      And when we say list, we mean like the regular lists we already have. Describe the item, link to an article if the thing has one, etc. This is why I suggested it as a subpage, I think it's cleaner that way.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • CoolDudeAl wrote:

      Utter solitude wrote:
      No, you can simply list things on a category similar to what you do with articles.

      If there's an issue with things being incomplete, perhaps we should start a campaign to have more complete pages? (we do have several unfinished recaps, transcripts, history sections, etc as well as lists)

      I think we could establish criteria (or go case by case) for characters who warrant a listing of their property. We could add that as a tab in trivia, as suggested, or create a link in infoboxes where needed (which is what I prefer).

      Yeah, do we have a list of things that are incomplete? I could probably help with some of it, but it's hard to know what things still need to be worked on.

      We can certainly create something like that. Currently, we have categories for articles needing attention and for unfinished transcripts, but perhaps a project page or a forum thread would help.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Utter solitude wrote:

      CoolDudeAl wrote:

      Utter solitude wrote:
      No, you can simply list things on a category similar to what you do with articles.

      If there's an issue with things being incomplete, perhaps we should start a campaign to have more complete pages? (we do have several unfinished recaps, transcripts, history sections, etc as well as lists)

      I think we could establish criteria (or go case by case) for characters who warrant a listing of their property. We could add that as a tab in trivia, as suggested, or create a link in infoboxes where needed (which is what I prefer).

      Yeah, do we have a list of things that are incomplete? I could probably help with some of it, but it's hard to know what things still need to be worked on.
      We can certainly create something like that. Currently, we have categories for articles needing attention and for unfinished transcripts, but perhaps a project page or a forum thread would help.

      I think that would be a really good thing to have. :)

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • I think a good course of action might be creating categories for things -- like the need attention category, but more specific? I was considering the other day making a category for unfinished episode recaps, to make it easier to find those episode articles. We could do that, and possibly make a similar category for unfinished lists, for incomplete history sections, for galleries lacking images from certain episodes, etc. These categories wouldn't need to be permanent, but could help us for the time being with expanding content, and could be added to the "What to do" page.

      (I am on my way home, and will look into possibilities for this when I get there)

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Utter solitude wrote:
      What would David's Truck entail?

      "He drove it here in this episode. He drove it in this episode, he drove it in this episode" XD

      And when we say list, we mean like the regular lists we already have. Describe the item, link to an article if the thing has one, etc. This is why I suggested it as a subpage, I think it's cleaner that way.

      Ah on that bicycle.

      Just like with the List of Enchanted Forest Characters f.e. I think that would be a cleaner way. But I dunno, Cruella's Car seems maybe too iconic to remove?

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Theres a discussion going on on that page specifically.

      We can always discuss things on a case by case basis

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Utter solitude wrote: What would David's Truck entail?

      "He drove it here in this episode. He drove it in this episode, he drove it in this episode" XD

      So, what's the point to have some locations page like the Marine Garage or the Cannery? Most of time, we just see them in the background of some scenes. of course we won't do a paragraph for each episode where they appears. Just the most important ones.

      Clearly, just like the Vehicles thing, i think the question is more about: "If an element appears a lot in the show, mostly in the background and is important in just one/two eps, does it deserve a page?" Is the big number of appearances is enough to create a page? I think we should discuss about it :)

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Well I mean when you guys change all the trivia sections to tabs, just add one more that says Known Property.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • MyPretties wrote:
      Well I mean when you guys change all the trivia sections to tabs, just add one more that says Known Property.


      I agree :) better than a whole new page :) Just a list in the trivia section with important items (not clothes for exemple) and the ep where it first appears  :)

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • I like the tab in trivia section idea 

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Lady Junky wrote:

      Utter solitude wrote: What would David's Truck entail?

      "He drove it here in this episode. He drove it in this episode, he drove it in this episode" XD

      So, what's the point to have some locations page like the Marine Garage or the Cannery? Most of time, we just see them in the background of some scenes. of course we won't do a paragraph for each episode where they appears. Just the most important ones.

      Clearly, just like the Vehicles thing, i think the question is more about: "If an element appears a lot in the show, mostly in the background and is important in just one/two eps, does it deserve a page?" Is the big number of appearances is enough to create a page? I think we should discuss about it :)

      I think that's an excellent question. If nothing significant occurs in a location/with an object, does it deserve a page if it appears a lot? Of course, I personally lean on the side of "no", of course, in my mind that kind of stuff becomes just background fixtures. But it's a good topic for discussion

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • I think a category for unfinished pages is a good idea since there is a lot of pages needing summaries and it could help out a lot.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Personal thought concerning "Charactername/Property" Why not list it as "Charactername's Personal items"

      otherwise I'm with listing it in the character trivia section under Personal Property/items

      NOTE: Latest notes and debate over character own cars each car I assume that has been in more than three episodes should get their own page with production notes, truck or car information from the maker of said car {Reginas car is a mercedes yes ? so we'd have iinfo from Mercedes about it too}

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • We can include in trivia that Regina drives a Mercedes (I think), tho. Imo it's not got enough going on to warrant an entire page, and neither do most character's cars. :3 and "Regina Mills/Property" makes that article a subpage of the Regina Mills article.. meaning it's tied to her main article and we avoid the "_____'s _____" stuff.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Two propositions:

      • This may have been suggested before (my apologies if it has recently) but perhaps a page for the Storybrooke town line is warranted? We see it often and it's been significant to the story many times.
      • Perhaps adding a "locations featured" section to episode pages? We could tab it like the trivia sections and divide it by world.

      I'm also going to move forward with making categories for things like unfinished recaps, history sections and list pages. I'll expand out the "What to do" page to include these. So any help adding these things would be great! I'm going to make templates (like the NeedAttention template) to use on pages that need to be in these categories.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • I agree with the town border page. Locations featured would be about the main locations or all seen, background and foreground?

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • I was thinking more of I guess "main" locations, like where things actually happen in the story.

      If we actually listed every location seen, even in the background, that's easily over a dozen locations if someone takes a stroll down Storybrooke's main street XD

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Thought so. Wanted to just clarify so people can see that it isn't just every single location shown :)

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • I agree with either having a personal property tab in the trivia section for character pages, or having subpages for them (CharacterName/Personal Property). 

      On the topic of whether an item/location deserves a page if it appears a lot but nothing particularly special happens with them, I'd say pages that like aren't necessary. I do believe minor locations like the cannery and dock do deserve pages because stuff actually happened there that and it wasn't just "Emma took a stroll there one day" or "David walked there and received a phone call, prompting him/her to turn back and go to ____".

      As for vehicle pages, I do think there's a risk of us going overboard and making pages for almost every car that's appeared more than a handful of times. I do think numerous appearances for an item or location should count towards considering if a page for it should be made, but at the same time, the history summary content should be considered as well. I was for the creation of David's truck, but now thinking about what the history section would look like for the vehicle, it would be a bit tedious. David drove here, David drove there. What other purposes did he use the truck for besides driving and parking it? I'm iffy about deleting Cruella's Car page because, on one hand, it's an iconic vehicle, but it also hasn't been used for much besides driving around, unless it could be considered essential that David did a search of the car and found Maleficent's baby rattle in it. 

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Applegirl wrote:

      As for vehicle pages, I do think there's a risk of us going overboard and making pages for almost every car that's appeared more than a handful of times. I do think numerous appearances for an item or location should count towards considering if a page for it should be made, but at the same time, the history summary content should be considered as well. I was for the creation of David's truck, but now thinking about what the history section would look like for the vehicle, it would be a bit tedious. David drove here, David drove there. What other purposes did he use the truck for besides driving and parking it? I'm iffy about deleting Cruella's Car page because, on one hand, it's an iconic vehicle, but it also hasn't been used for much besides driving around, unless it could be considered essential that David did a search of the car and found Maleficent's baby rattle in it. 

      My thought on this is why not go with how many times the car or truck appeared in the show ? Like "OK, Cruellas car has been in two episodes already; lets wait a few more episodes to give it its own page" I know Davids truck deserves a page because its pretty much in season one and two as it is! Same with Emmas yellow bug and Reginas car; even Grumpy's 'truck' {the Van} warants a page I think.

      Might just be me though

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Teyilia wrote:

      My thought on this is why not go with how many times the car or truck appeared in the show ? Like "OK, Cruellas car has been in two episodes already; lets wait a few more episodes to give it its own page" I know Davids truck deserves a page because its pretty much in season one and two as it is! Same with Emmas yellow bug and Reginas car; even Grumpy's 'truck' {the Van} warants a page I think.

      Might just be me though


      A vehicle's frequent appearances could be considered valid enough to create a page for it, but I personally believe the history summary content should also be taken into perspective. Like, David's truck has appeared a lot, but has he actually used the truck for much besides driving it around?

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • I think what we should do is add a quote for the episode pages, representing the episode.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • I think there should be a page for the glass unicorns mobile

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Even though it's been seen alot, I don't think the Mobile warrants a seperate page.  It has no special properties, it was simply a gift from Cinderella to Snow/Charming for their Nursery.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • It should be at least in the List of Items page.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • That I could see.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Then add it. Nobody is stopping you lol.

      Eta: I apologize for the sass. The hormones are getting to me. My point is, please, if you feel something should be on a list page, add it! It may not be significant enough for an article, but the information should be noted, and lists can let us know when we should create a full article.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • No apology needed.  You wouldn't be Utter without a least a little bit of the sass. It suits you well. :)

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • ty lol

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Hey guys,

      I was browsing the wiki and noticed an issue which i raised here Once Upon a Time Wiki talk:Manual of Style. I'll post it here also:

      Currently, whenever you have a character you add the "Icons|character" template which adds the character to "Category:Characters". This however, is bad practice. Wikipedia and most other wikis have a guideline of NOT placing a page into parent category of another category its already placed in.

      Currently, you might have a character as Snow White which is in the categories "Female Characters", "Season 1 Characters", "Season 2 Characters", "Season 3 Characters", "Season 4 Characters", "Once Upon a Time Characters", "Shadow of the Queen Characters" and "Out of the Past Characters" - all of these categories are under "Category:Characters" which makes placing Snow White also in the parent category very much redundant and basically makes the categorization pointless. The same also goes for "Category:Once Upon a Time Characters" as all the season categories are under that category. What I propose is that only categories should be left in the "Characters" and "Once Upon a Time Characters" categories and not any individual page.

      Also, regarding the character categories, I have a suggestion of adding new categories based on fairytale. For example:

      In "Category:Little Red Riding Hood characters" you will find Red Riding Hood, Granny (Enchanted Forest). In "Category:Snow White characters" you will find Snow White, Evil Queen, Prince Charming, Magic Mirror, Huntsman, King Leopold, Eva and the dwarves. Each fariytale will have its own category, with another category for "Category:Original Once Upon a Time characters" (that did not come from the fairytales).The fariytale categories would be nested under "Category:Fairytale characters" which would be nested under "Category:Characters".
        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Discussion topics aren't usually posted on talk pages, so please only post on the forums or this thread if you have a suggestion for a new page or category.

      It may be redundant, but for myself personally, I like the way the categories are on the wiki. 

      For having characters listed by fairytale... I think that could get a little messy for some characters. Some characters are not 100% on-screen adaptations of the existing characters in the original fairytales, or may vary in some way. For example, the Evil Queen is not Ursula, but for the episode "Ariel", she pretended to be Ursula. So, technically, she belongs under the Category:Little Mermaid Characters because she embodied the role of Ursula for that one episode, but I think that look very confusing. There are also characters who are not full adaptations of existing fairytale characters, and it's only implied the character was inspired from the fairytale, or is an allusion to the character from the tale. Putting those characters in the fairytale categories would not factually incorrect if they are only implied. Like, King Leopold finding the lamp. Does that make him Aladdin? No, but he released the genie from the lamp by rubbing it, which is a clear reference to the Aladdin tale itself. The wiki pages for the fairytale stories itself is more practical in my view because characters who were adapted on-screen or implied to be an allusion to a certain existing story character are listed on those pages.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Proposing a page for Operation Cobra.

      It's a fairly big thing in season one, and drives many of Henry's action therein.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • I agree.

      Not only is it one of the driving forces of Season one, it is referenced quite often later in the series. (In fact, Operation Mongoose could be said to be Regina's Answer to Operation Cobra, since a Mongoose is one of the few creatures that can handle a cobra.)

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • I agree too :) We could also do the same thing for Operation Scorpion and Operation Mangoose :)

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Agreed with all three Operation pages :P

        Preparing Editor Spell
    •   Preparing Editor Spell
    • Tysonjackson wrote: I suggest a page similar to these w:c:supernatural:Big Bad / w:c:trueblood:Primary Antagonists / w:c:pll:Primary Antagonists

      disagree

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • WhatTheEvenBelle wrote:

      Tysonjackson wrote: I suggest a page similar to these w:c:supernatural:Big Bad / w:c:trueblood:Primary Antagonists / w:c:pll:Primary Antagonists

      disagree

      Same.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Tysonjackson wrote:
      I suggest a page similar to these w:c:supernatural:Big Bad / w:c:trueblood:Primary Antagonists / w:c:pll:Primary Antagonists


      I disagree too. I never see the point of this kind of pages. People know who are the villains.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • I disagree as well.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Lady Junky wrote: I agree too :) We could also do the same thing for Operation Scorpion and Operation Mangoose :)

      What about Operation Praying Mantis? - The mission to expose Tamara.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Jdg98 wrote:

      Lady Junky wrote: I agree too :) We could also do the same thing for Operation Scorpion and Operation Mangoose :)

      What about Operation Praying Mantis? - The mission to expose Tamara.

      Yup :P I'm gonna work on the Operations infobox later. What should we have? Participants, purpose, appearances, previous and next operations, what else?

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Killian Jones wrote:

      Jdg98 wrote:

      Lady Junky wrote: I agree too :) We could also do the same thing for Operation Scorpion and Operation Mangoose :)

      What about Operation Praying Mantis? - The mission to expose Tamara.
      Yup :P I'm gonna work on the Operations infobox later. What should we have? Participants, purpose, appearances, previous and next operations, what else?


      Status and who decided to do it?

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • The Event template seems to have everything we need already :3

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Should we add a page for the Authors magic quill/pen and ink? I think they're going to become pretty important and they've already played a large part in Cruellas backstory.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Hey guys! I was wondering whether we could create separate pages for the magical abilities present in the series that are not listed in the Wiki, such as flight (ability to fly) and teleportation. For example, fairies such as Tinkerbell and the Blue Fairy can fly or The Shadow and Zelena (through an enchanted broom of course), etc. Also, teleportation is very evident as practiced by mostly all the villains (Regina, Rumple, Cora, Pan, Zelena, Ingrid, Maleficent). Any suggestions? Thanks :)

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Ouatiwillalwaysfindyou wrote:
      Hey guys! I was wondering whether we could create separate pages for the magical abilities present in the series that are not listed in the Wiki, such as flight (ability to fly) and teleportation. For example, fairies such as Tinkerbell and the Blue Fairy can fly or The Shadow and Zelena (through an enchanted broom of course), etc. Also, teleportation is very evident as practiced by mostly all the villains (Regina, Rumple, Cora, Pan, Zelena, Ingrid, Maleficent). Any suggestions? Thanks :)

      I agree that flight's an ability rather than spell or stuff. Teleportation on the other hand seems to be a magic spell., since we see it learned by Zelena and Regina.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • To me Ingrid didn't exactly teleport, more like shattered into snow and flew off in a small flurry. Not sure if that counts as a magical spell or just something from her ice magic ?

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Teyilia wrote:
      To me Ingrid didn't exactly teleport, more like shattered into snow and flew off in a small flurry. Not sure if that counts as a magical spell or just something from her ice magic ?

      She teleported, I think. Unless her hair is made from ice and snow, lol. I actually think she uses ice and witchcraft. After all she can use telekinetic soimething and use mirror magic.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Eskaver wrote:
      Teyilia wrote:
      To me Ingrid didn't exactly teleport, more like shattered into snow and flew off in a small flurry. Not sure if that counts as a magical spell or just something from her ice magic ?
      She teleported, I think. Unless her hair is made from ice and snow, lol. I actually think she uses ice and witchcraft. After all she can use telekinetic soimething and use mirror magic.

      I dont know. In my stories and personal head!canon, Elsa when she mastered her magic, could literally shatter and turn into shards of ice and snowflakes to get into and out of places, its not exactly teleporting per sei, but still it works to get places quickly.

      So naturallky I think Ingrid the same way; feel free to correct if I'm wrong though, this is just my personal headcanon on the topic

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • So can we have a vote on creating separate pages for "flight" and "teleportation". This will make it easier to link it to the main page of "Magic." 

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • I have a few suggestions:

      • Murray's Club (location)
      • Lord Macintosh (character)
      • Dragonflies (species)

      Also, many Wonderland locations from the spin-off, such as:

      • Tum Tum Tree
      • Mallow Marsh
      • Tulgey Woods
      • Greener Pastures
      • Mimsy Meadows
      • Boiling Sea
        Preparing Editor Spell
    • For now, I agree with having a page for the Boiling Sea

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • I think that Lord Macintosh should have a page.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • I suggest to have Queens of Darkness page. It's a group of characters and also the main vaillains in 5B. I think it's very important

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • CadoDoan wrote:
      I suggest to have Queens of Darkness page. It's a group of characters and also the main vaillains in 5B. I think it's very important


      We already discussed about it, and it was decided to not create it. All members of this group have their own pages already.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Lord Macintosh shouls since he is returning

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • I would suggest the creation of some sort of Holy Grail Magic section on the Magic page (doesn't really deserve its own page).  I don't know what it would be called...but it's the magic that Merlin, Nimue, and all dark ones have.  Magic from the Holy Grail.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Indeed, wasn't it stated that magic originates from the Holy Grail pretty much?

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • I also suggest a page for the Witch's Cottage. It appeared four times over the course of two episodes, and pretty important events occured there.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Andrew Robbins wrote: I also suggest a page for the Witch's Cottage. It appeared four times over the course of two episodes, and pretty important events occured there.

      Sure.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • I suggest a page for Magical Onion Rings.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Definitely no. Super background and unimportant. The Onion Rings weren't magical, Emma simply cast a spell on them, or poured a potion over them.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Guys, if you are going to suggest something, then let the discussion finish before going ahead. If you don't want to wait and hear what others think, create the page without suggesting it. Of course this would mean others might want to delete it, which is why suggesting it and discussing it first is better to avoid creating a page that would end up being deleted.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Killian Jones wrote:
      Guys, if you are going to suggest something, then let the discussion finish before going ahead. If you don't want to wait and hear what others think, create the page without suggesting it. Of course this would mean others might want to delete it, which is why suggesting it and discussing it first is better to avoid creating a page that would end up being deleted.

      I just want to add that I think it is deeply disrespectful to ask people opinions about something, and then to do this thing after only one person gave an answer. That's the point of this thread: asking the community. If you do not want to respect the rest of the community, no need to ask.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Most people (with a few exceptions) in this thread don't really seen to care about creating new pages (which is odd, because that's the whole point of the thread). I suggested nine new pages, and only three people came forward, only voting for two of them. Last time I checked, you can disagree with their creation as well, but most people would rather just stay silent. I would very much wait for the discussion to finish, but, if I actually waited, I knew that it wouldn't even start in the first place.

      However, that's not even why I created it. I suggested a page for Lord Macintosh, only two people agreed, and, on the next day I come to the Wiki: boom, someone created it. So I thought that the voting system had changed or something along those lines, and that the users were more free to create new pages. Clearly, I was mistaken, and for that I apologize.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • You are not recieving a warning or anything, all I'm saying is, if you don't consider the discussion worthy, then don't go through the trouble of discussing :P And risk having others want to delete the page later.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • I know, I'm just making clear that I do care about the community's opinion and was willing to hear it, but, since it didn't come, I just decided to go on without it.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Lady Junky wrote:
      Killian Jones wrote:
      Guys, if you are going to suggest something, then let the discussion finish before going ahead. If you don't want to wait and hear what others think, create the page without suggesting it. Of course this would mean others might want to delete it, which is why suggesting it and discussing it first is better to avoid creating a page that would end up being deleted.
      I just want to add that I think it is deeply disrespectful to ask people opinions about something, and then to do this thing after only one person gave an answer. That's the point of this thread: asking the community. If you do not want to respect the rest of the community, no need to ask.

      Lady and Killian, if no one responds, that says to me they don't care either way. So if Andrew wants to create them, he should. If we then get a large number of people who say we shouldn't have it we can delete it then. But seeing as they don't comment on it in the first place, I doubt anyone would care much if it was created.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • If noone responds over the course of one day? xD People don't come to the wiki every single day. However, it's ok if you want to create a page. Some people do it without even suggesting it.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Killian Jones wrote:
      If noone responds over the course of one day? xD People don't come to the wiki every single day. However, it's ok if you want to create a page. Some people do it without even suggesting it.

      Wait, who only waited one day? I don't see anyone who only waited one day.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • CoolDudeAl wrote:
      Killian Jones wrote:
      If noone responds over the course of one day? xD People don't come to the wiki every single day. However, it's ok if you want to create a page. Some people do it without even suggesting it.
      Wait, who only waited one day? I don't see anyone who only waited one day.

      That would be me with the Witch's Cottage. I only waited one day because, even after 5 days, my suggestion of the Wonderland locations only had one opinion (Killian's), so I figured it wouldn't be any different with this one. Last time I checked, people get notifications when someone posts something in a thread they're involved with, and there are many people involved with this thread who just choose to ignore new messages.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Ok, this got super off topic. Back to the suggestions now! :)

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Let's add an Underworld page!

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • We need a page for Baby Hood.

      I was told to wait until we got a name, but it seems that won't happen anytime soon. For now, we could name it Baby Hood, as it is the only canon way she was called.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • FrancisPaul wrote:
      We need a page for Baby Hood.

      I was told to wait until we got a name, but it seems that won't happen anytime soon. For now, we could name it Baby Hood, as it is the only canon way she was called.

      I do think that she needs a page, but I'd rather name it Zelena's Daughter.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Andrew Robbins wrote:
      FrancisPaul wrote:
      We need a page for Baby Hood.

      I was told to wait until we got a name, but it seems that won't happen anytime soon. For now, we could name it Baby Hood, as it is the only canon way she was called.

      I do think that she needs a page, but I'd rather name it Zelena's Daughter.

      I created it as Zelena's Daughter, but some users find disrespectful to Robin.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • I agree with an Underworld page as it has been mentioned several times, even if it won't appear until March, we could still create the page.

      Baby Hood is the better name for the new baby on the show. 

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • I say we make a "Mark of Charon" page

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Gusey1397 wrote:
      I agree with an Underworld page as it has been mentioned several times, even if it won't appear until March, we could still create the page.

      Baby Hood is the better name for the new baby on the show. 

      So can I create it? Anyone objects?

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • FrancisPaul wrote:
      Gusey1397 wrote:
      I agree with an Underworld page as it has been mentioned several times, even if it won't appear until March, we could still create the page.

      Baby Hood is the better name for the new baby on the show. 

      So can I create it? Anyone objects?


      We already had some instruction for this page. And don't pretend you don't know them ;)

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • FrancisPaul wrote:
      Gusey1397 wrote:
      I agree with an Underworld page as it has been mentioned several times, even if it won't appear until March, we could still create the page.

      Baby Hood is the better name for the new baby on the show. 

      So can I create it? Anyone objects?

      The Underworld page? It's already made.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • We need a page for magic beans

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Magic Beans. We already have one :P

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Okay, thanks I didn't know :)

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Lady Junky wrote:
      FrancisPaul wrote:
      Gusey1397 wrote:
      I agree with an Underworld page as it has been mentioned several times, even if it won't appear until March, we could still create the page.

      Baby Hood is the better name for the new baby on the show. 

      So can I create it? Anyone objects?

      We already had some instruction for this page. And don't pretend you don't know them ;)

      The instrucion was to wait until we had a name. But we thought we would have one by the end of 5A, which didn't happen.

      I just thought of asking people's opinions if it's worth to create it as Baby Hood for now or if we really should wait months. It's not like we never had Nolan Baby created before we knew his name.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Except we got the confirmation that we will have Neal's name by the end of S3. For Baby Hood, they just told us that they decided a name, they never told us that we will have it before the end of 5a.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • I say we make a "Mark of Charon" page

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Onceuponfan123 wrote: I say we make a "Mark of Charon" page

      I say we do Charon (he's appeared three times and his mark played a major part in the finale) and just include it on there.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Darkness Approaches
      Darkness Approaches removed this reply because:
      sorry
      20:39, December 18, 2015
      This reply has been removed
    • I say we make a Charon and a Mark of Charon page.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • I disagree completely with the Mark of Charon page, and I think Charon is still too minor.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • How about a Helm page (the one from The Bear King, possesed by Fergus)?

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Onceuponfan123 wrote:
      How about a Helm page (the one from The Bear King, possesed by Fergus)?


      Enchanted Helm ^^

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Onceuponfan123 wrote:
      How about a Helm page (the one from The Bear King, possesed by Fergus)?

      Enchanted Helm :)

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Is there a page like a List of Resurrections?

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Onceuponfan123 wrote:
      Is there a page like a List of Resurrections?

      No but they are already listed on the List of Deceased people

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • CadoDoan wrote:
      I suggest to have Queens of Darkness page. It's a group of characters and also the main vaillains in 5B. I think it's very important


      I'm still against the creation of a page for this group (as I was last time). The way I see it, Queens of Darkness is more of a group title rather than a title meant to demonstrate everyone in the group is bound together by the same kind of magic or by the sameness in species. For example, there's a page for the Sisters of Saint Meissa. They're nuns, and all are former fairies (or still fairies, in some sense, if it's assumed the other nuns besides Mother Superior can still wield fairy wands).

      Onceuponfan123 wrote:
      I say we make a Charon and a Mark of Charon page.

      Charon is still a minor character, I think. Mark of Charon page ... I dunno. The mark was only prominent for one episode, but it was the main focal point for its only appearance, so I could see a page for it. Charon, however, only appeared very briefly in one prior episode with the fury, and in "Swan Song", he appeared again, but his appearance was brief as well. And both times all he did was stand ominously on his boat as it comes into view on the lake. That's not a whole lot of information to give him for summaries if he had his own page.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • I think we should have a deleted scenes page...

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Onceuponfan123 wrote:
      I think we should have a deleted scenes page...

      Since the deleted scenes are on the episode pages, I disagree

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Category: hero (Snow White, Igrid, David Nolan)
      Category: villian (Cruella, Cora, Peter Pan)
      Category: former villain (Gold, Regina, Hook, Ingrid)


      Would be good

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • No, we have already discussed that several times, and the community consensus is to not categorize characters into heroes or villains.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Gusey1397 wrote:
      Onceuponfan123 wrote:
      I think we should have a deleted scenes page...
      Since the deleted scenes are on the episode pages, I disagree

      Well... there are goofs on the episode pages and there's a list of goofs page.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Onceuponfan123 wrote:
      I think we should have a deleted scenes page...

      I think a list page for the deleted scenes would be good, and then they can have a link to the section on the episode page where they are explained.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • CoolDudeAl wrote:
      Onceuponfan123 wrote:
      I think we should have a deleted scenes page...
      I think a list page for the deleted scenes would be good, and then they can have a link to the section on the episode page where they are explained.

      Agree.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • I disagree with a page for deleted scenes. It just makes editing more complicated. Every time you have to edit a deleted scene, you have to do it on the page and on the episode article? I'm not a fan of duplicate content.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Are we not already duplicating content tho? XD

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • We are! (Ex. List of Goofs)

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • And the List of Disney References. And fairy tale references...

      Personally, I would love a page about deleted scenes. We could use a table, with pictures. Would make it more interesting. Or a format similar to the lists of Minor Items and Locations.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Nightlily wrote: And the List of Disney References. And fairy tale references...

      Personally, I would love a page about deleted scenes. We could use a table, with pictures. Would make it more interesting. Or a format similar to the lists of Minor Items and Locations.

      Sounds good :P

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Nightlily wrote:
      And the List of Disney References. And fairy tale references...

      Personally, I would love a page about deleted scenes. We could use a table, with pictures. Would make it more interesting. Or a format similar to the lists of Minor Items and Locations.

      I agree. I was planning on going through the Bluray's Deleted Scenes for the first four seasons, to get the title, cast that appears, and to see if I can write a plot summary if we don't have one written yet. And obviously put which episode it would have appeared in. I'll probably make a thread. That way I can also ask questions, if I have any.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • If we do this page, we have to separate canon deleted scenes and no canon scenes too. Canon DS are a way more important.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Lady Junky wrote:
      If we do this page, we have to separate canon deleted scenes and no canon scenes too. Canon DS are a way more important.

      According to Adam, everything on the DVD's/Bluray's should be canon (although he would have to double check for Seasons 1-3). So everything I work on will be canon/should be canon as far as Adam knows.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • No, let's not change what he said. He never said ALL DVD/Blu ray scenes should be canon. He said all DS from S4 DVD/BR and onwards will be canon. For the first 3 seasons, he never said "they should be" just that "they are supposed to" and that he must double check. So no, scenes from S1 to S3 are not canon and are not considered as canon.

      So no, everything you will work on won't be canon.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Lady Junky wrote:
      No, let's not change what he said. He never said ALL DVD/Blu ray scenes should be canon. He said all DS from S4 DVD/BR and onwards will be canon. For the first 3 seasons, he never said "they should be" just that "they are supposed to" and that he must double check. So no, scenes from S1 to S3 are not canon and are not considered as canon.

      So no, everything you will work on won't be canon.

      That's really splitting hairs, Lady. We should consider them "most likely canon" at the very least.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • CoolDudeAl wrote:
      Lady Junky wrote:
      No, let's not change what he said. He never said ALL DVD/Blu ray scenes should be canon. He said all DS from S4 DVD/BR and onwards will be canon. For the first 3 seasons, he never said "they should be" just that "they are supposed to" and that he must double check. So no, scenes from S1 to S3 are not canon and are not considered as canon.

      So no, everything you will work on won't be canon.

      That's really splitting hairs, Lady. We should consider them "most likely canon" at the very least.


      No we won't. Because they are not canon, and because Adam himself said that he must double check them. So no, that"s not "really splitting hairs", that's just following what Adam is saying. We're fans, we're not up to decide what is considered as canon and what is not. That's why we don't include scenes from S1 to S3 on characters pages. Not canon.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Either way, a few have been confirmed canon, like the Hook scene in 2x12 :)

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Gusey1397 wrote:
      Either way, a few have been confirmed canon, like the Hook scene in 2x12 :)


      Exactly, and we only consider it as canon cos Adam told us it was :) And that's what we will do with the others ones :)

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Lady Junky wrote:
      CoolDudeAl wrote:
      Lady Junky wrote:
      No, let's not change what he said. He never said ALL DVD/Blu ray scenes should be canon. He said all DS from S4 DVD/BR and onwards will be canon. For the first 3 seasons, he never said "they should be" just that "they are supposed to" and that he must double check. So no, scenes from S1 to S3 are not canon and are not considered as canon.

      So no, everything you will work on won't be canon.

      That's really splitting hairs, Lady. We should consider them "most likely canon" at the very least.

      No we won't. Because they are not canon, and because Adam himself said that he must double check them. So no, that"s not "really splitting hairs", that's just following what Adam is saying. We're fans, we're not up to decide what is considered as canon and what is not. That's why we don't include scenes from S1 to S3 on characters pages. Not canon.

      But that's the thing, Adam basically said "as far as I know they should be canon, but I would have to double check". He's saying they are canon, as far as he knows. The phrase "double check" indicates he believes they are canon. That's what he would be double checking. Saying they are "not canon" is simply not true. That implies it was confirmed to not be canon. But it was confirmed that they are, pending a check, canon. Like I said, "most likely canon" is what we should consider them.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • CoolDudeAl wrote:
      Lady Junky wrote:
      CoolDudeAl wrote:
      Lady Junky wrote:
      No, let's not change what he said. He never said ALL DVD/Blu ray scenes should be canon. He said all DS from S4 DVD/BR and onwards will be canon. For the first 3 seasons, he never said "they should be" just that "they are supposed to" and that he must double check. So no, scenes from S1 to S3 are not canon and are not considered as canon.

      So no, everything you will work on won't be canon.

      That's really splitting hairs, Lady. We should consider them "most likely canon" at the very least.

      No we won't. Because they are not canon, and because Adam himself said that he must double check them. So no, that"s not "really splitting hairs", that's just following what Adam is saying. We're fans, we're not up to decide what is considered as canon and what is not. That's why we don't include scenes from S1 to S3 on characters pages. Not canon.
      But that's the thing, Adam basically said "as far as I know they should be canon, but I would have to double check". He's saying they are canon, as far as he knows. The phrase "double check" indicates he believes they are canon. That's what he would be double checking. Saying they are "not canon" is simply not true. That implies it was confirmed to not be canon. But it was confirmed that they are, pending a check, canon. Like I said, "most likely canon" is what we should consider them.

      Again, we won't consider them as canon until we have a confirmation. That's what was decided and that"s how we will work. Supposition are definitely not confirmation. Then, it is not the place for that.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Lady Junky wrote:
      CoolDudeAl wrote:
      Lady Junky wrote:
      CoolDudeAl wrote:
      Lady Junky wrote:
      No, let's not change what he said. He never said ALL DVD/Blu ray scenes should be canon. He said all DS from S4 DVD/BR and onwards will be canon. For the first 3 seasons, he never said "they should be" just that "they are supposed to" and that he must double check. So no, scenes from S1 to S3 are not canon and are not considered as canon.

      So no, everything you will work on won't be canon.

      That's really splitting hairs, Lady. We should consider them "most likely canon" at the very least.

      No we won't. Because they are not canon, and because Adam himself said that he must double check them. So no, that"s not "really splitting hairs", that's just following what Adam is saying. We're fans, we're not up to decide what is considered as canon and what is not. That's why we don't include scenes from S1 to S3 on characters pages. Not canon.
      But that's the thing, Adam basically said "as far as I know they should be canon, but I would have to double check". He's saying they are canon, as far as he knows. The phrase "double check" indicates he believes they are canon. That's what he would be double checking. Saying they are "not canon" is simply not true. That implies it was confirmed to not be canon. But it was confirmed that they are, pending a check, canon. Like I said, "most likely canon" is what we should consider them.
      Again, we won't consider them as canon until we have a confirmation. That's what was decided and that"s how we will work. Supposition are definitely not confirmation. Then, it is not the place for that.

      I created a thread, so we can get more opinions specifically on what to do with them. I always here about these decisions that were made, but I have never actually seen when, where, or by who they were made.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Regarding the deleted scenes page idea, I personally think ALL of the released deleted scenes should be mentioned on a deleted scenes page, whether canon or not canon. Just make a "this scene is confirmed to be canon" note for all the 100% confirmed ones.  

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • ItachiIshtar wrote:
      Regarding the deleted scenes page idea, I personally think ALL of the released deleted scenes should be mentioned on a deleted scenes page, whether canon or not canon. Just make a "this scene is confirmed to be canon" note for all the 100% confirmed ones.  

      Of course all scenes should be included, just saying we should do a section for "canon ds" and "no canon ds".

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Lady Junky wrote:
      ItachiIshtar wrote:
      Regarding the deleted scenes page idea, I personally think ALL of the released deleted scenes should be mentioned on a deleted scenes page, whether canon or not canon. Just make a "this scene is confirmed to be canon" note for all the 100% confirmed ones.  
      Of course all scenes should be included, just saying we should do a section for "canon ds" and "no canon ds".

      And I'm just saying that Season 1 - 3 deleted scenes are in a grey area right now, but fall closer to canon, than not canon.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • How about a page about dark magic?

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • I want to make a page on the Middlemist Flower featured in "The Broken Kingdom", "Nimue", and "Broken Heart". Do you guys think this is a good idea?

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • As I stated in my wall, I think it is too minor. It doesn't do anything xD If it was an ingredient for a potion, or had any kind of magical property whatsoever perhaps, but it doesn't-

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Midas has magic... he can turn anything into gold. I know it is minor, yet there is gold magic in the show. maybe we should make a Magic/Gold Magic page. Any thoughts? Also, if we do make it, Cora and Rumplestiltskin could turn hay into gold ( The Miller's Daughter ).

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • No, what Cora and Rumple do is witchcraft. And we don't have pages for specific and unique abilities, we have pages for types of magic. Besides, we don't know what the nature of Midas' power is.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Killian Jones wrote:
      No, what Cora and Rumple do is witchcraft. And we don't have pages for specific and unique abilities, we have pages for types of magic. Besides, we don't know what the nature of Midas' power is.

      We know. 113 stated that it is a curse. So, not a power or ability that Midas has.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • What about a page for Robin and Zelena's daughter?

      And maybe we can add parallel for the episode's trivia?

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • 123a123 wrote:
      What about a page for Robin and Zelena's daughter?

      And maybe we can add parallel for the episode's trivia?

      We said we wait to know the name of the baby before creating her page ^^

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • How about we make a category for Other Quotes on the character pages?

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Onceuponfan123 wrote: How about we make a category for Other Quotes on the character pages?

      I assume you mean a section. :D

      Disagree. Something like that would quickly get out of hand.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • I know this has been discussed in the past but I still vote for a category (or page) for Antagonists that lists the primary antagonist(s) of each season since each season arc is centered around its antagonist. And I know some of you might say "We already deleted the villains category" but that's not the same thing. Villain is a wicked character, antagonist represents the primary problem.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • http://onceuponatime.wikia.com/wiki/User:Tysonjackson/Antagonists Here is a user page I made a while ago as a testing thing to kinda show what I am talking about. Or even listing it in the page somewhere. Like in the notes "Regina was the primary antagonist for Season 1". It's very informative and with a show like this that doesn't just have antagonists, but rather has arcs centering on them, I think it should be noted at least somewhere. :/

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Disagree.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Tysonjackson wrote:
      http://onceuponatime.wikia.com/wiki/User:Tysonjackson/Antagonists Here is a user page I made a while ago as a testing thing to kinda show what I am talking about. Or even listing it in the page somewhere. Like in the notes "Regina was the primary antagonist for Season 1". It's very informative and with a show like this that doesn't just have antagonists, but rather has arcs centering on them, I think it should be noted at least somewhere. :/

      Okay now stop. We already suggested it when it was there. We agreed to delete these kind of categories. You already suggested it again, we also disagreed at this time. You were allowed to do it on your userpage, because you like that, fine. Again, we still disagreed to do it on the wiki.

      Clearly, do you plan to suggest it each 3/4 months, hoping that we will say yes at a moment or what?

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Lady Junky wrote:

      Tysonjackson wrote:
      http://onceuponatime.wikia.com/wiki/User:Tysonjackson/Antagonists Here is a user page I made a while ago as a testing thing to kinda show what I am talking about. Or even listing it in the page somewhere. Like in the notes "Regina was the primary antagonist for Season 1". It's very informative and with a show like this that doesn't just have antagonists, but rather has arcs centering on them, I think it should be noted at least somewhere. :/

      Okay now stop. We already suggested it when it was there. We agreed to delete these kind of categories. You already suggested it again, we also disagreed at this time. You were allowed to do it on your userpage, because you like that, fine. Again, we still disagreed to do it on the wiki.

      Clearly, do you plan to suggest it each 3/4 months, hoping that we will say yes at a moment or what?

      Um actually no Lady, it was agreed to delete Heroes and Villains, not Antagonists because there has never been an antagonist category. And if you need to know why those aren't in anyway the same thing then please do some research. And if there was ever a category or page like that it was before I came here so please forgive me for not realizing.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • You already suggested to create these categories. And we already disagreed. That's all what I say.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Tysonjackson wrote:
      http://onceuponatime.wikia.com/wiki/User:Tysonjackson/Antagonists Here is a user page I made a while ago as a testing thing to kinda show what I am talking about. Or even listing it in the page somewhere. Like in the notes "Regina was the primary antagonist for Season 1". It's very informative and with a show like this that doesn't just have antagonists, but rather has arcs centering on them, I think it should be noted at least somewhere. :/

      The problem with your list is that it is over-simplifying the show. Hook was an antagonist in season 2, Issac was an antagonist in 4B, and I don't think Emma was really an antagonist in 5A. It was more Nimue or The Darkness. As well as Arthur and Zelena. This is the problem with having it as a category/page/etc.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • CoolDudeAl wrote:

      Tysonjackson wrote:
      http://onceuponatime.wikia.com/wiki/User:Tysonjackson/Antagonists Here is a user page I made a while ago as a testing thing to kinda show what I am talking about. Or even listing it in the page somewhere. Like in the notes "Regina was the primary antagonist for Season 1". It's very informative and with a show like this that doesn't just have antagonists, but rather has arcs centering on them, I think it should be noted at least somewhere. :/

      The problem with your list is that it is over-simplifying the show. Hook was an antagonist in season 2, Issac was an antagonist in 4B, and I don't think Emma was really an antagonist in 5A. It was more Nimue or The Darkness. As well as Arthur and Zelena. This is the problem with having it as a category/page/etc.

      I haven't updated it since Nimue and the others entered the picture in 5a. And Hook wasn't a main for s2. He was secondary for both halves. Cora was main. As for Isaac, S4b's antagonist is up for debate. Rumple is the antagonist but for the first half he's joined in the role by the Queens. In the second half he receives help from Isaac, but they aren't really equal partners. :/

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Tysonjackson wrote:

      CoolDudeAl wrote:

      Tysonjackson wrote:
      http://onceuponatime.wikia.com/wiki/User:Tysonjackson/Antagonists Here is a user page I made a while ago as a testing thing to kinda show what I am talking about. Or even listing it in the page somewhere. Like in the notes "Regina was the primary antagonist for Season 1". It's very informative and with a show like this that doesn't just have antagonists, but rather has arcs centering on them, I think it should be noted at least somewhere. :/
      The problem with your list is that it is over-simplifying the show. Hook was an antagonist in season 2, Issac was an antagonist in 4B, and I don't think Emma was really an antagonist in 5A. It was more Nimue or The Darkness. As well as Arthur and Zelena. This is the problem with having it as a category/page/etc.

      I haven't updated it since Nimue and the others entered the picture in 5a. And Hook wasn't a main for s2. He was secondary for both halves. Cora was main. As for Isaac, S4b's antagonist is up for debate. Rumple is the antagonist but for the first half he's joined in the role by the Queens. In the second half he receives help from Isaac, but they aren't really equal partners. :/

      And there within lies the problem to trying to do a page for this. Too many posibilities.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • CoolDudeAl wrote:
      Tysonjackson wrote:

      CoolDudeAl wrote:


      Tysonjackson wrote:
      http://onceuponatime.wikia.com/wiki/User:Tysonjackson/Antagonists Here is a user page I made a while ago as a testing thing to kinda show what I am talking about. Or even listing it in the page somewhere. Like in the notes "Regina was the primary antagonist for Season 1". It's very informative and with a show like this that doesn't just have antagonists, but rather has arcs centering on them, I think it should be noted at least somewhere. :/
      The problem with your list is that it is over-simplifying the show. Hook was an antagonist in season 2, Issac was an antagonist in 4B, and I don't think Emma was really an antagonist in 5A. It was more Nimue or The Darkness. As well as Arthur and Zelena. This is the problem with having it as a category/page/etc.
      I haven't updated it since Nimue and the others entered the picture in 5a. And Hook wasn't a main for s2. He was secondary for both halves. Cora was main. As for Isaac, S4b's antagonist is up for debate. Rumple is the antagonist but for the first half he's joined in the role by the Queens. In the second half he receives help from Isaac, but they aren't really equal partners. :/
      And there within lies the problem to trying to do a page for this. Too many posibilities.

      I agree. Too many opinions in here. S2, 4B and 5A complicates things because there were millions of villains, I mean can we actually say that Greg and Tamara were big bads if it is revealed that they were minions of Pan? can we actually say that Cruella and Ursula were big bads if they had no real impact or climax on the show? Can we actually say that Emma was a big bad if all she did was speaking in a monotonic voice?

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • We're moving a little off course here so I'm gonna move the current convo to a different thread :)

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Maybe we can add a parallels section to the trivia section of the episodes pages?

      for example: a parallel between Pilot and It's Not Easy Being Green:                                             in the Pilot when Regina is in Snow and Charming's wedding, she said she came to give them a gift, Snow says that they want nothing from her and Regina says that thay shall have it and the gift is this happy (happy) day. In It's not easy being green Zelena is at Grany's, she says she brought a gift for Regina, Regina says she doesn't want a gift from her but Zelena says that she shall have it and her gift is this sad (sad) day.                                                      

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Disagree

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Agree with 123a123

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Anyone else?

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Agree with parallels, great idea!

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • 123a123 wrote:
      Maybe we can add a parallels section to the trivia section of the episodes pages?

      for example: a parallel between Pilot and It's Not Easy Being Green:                                             in the Pilot when Regina is in Snow and Charming's wedding, she said she came to give them a gift, Snow says that they want nothing from her and Regina says that thay shall have it and the gift is this happy (happy) day. In It's not easy being green Zelena is at Grany's, she says she brought a gift for Regina, Regina says she doesn't want a gift from her but Zelena says that she shall have it and her gift is this sad (sad) day.                                                      


      You know that we already have this kind of details in Episode Connections, right? So, what's the point to do a second section with and for the same thing?

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • It's not the same thing.

      What I suggest is to have a section of things that are alike between episodes (like the example I gave) because there are a lot in the show.

      Episodes conections is something else

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • And again, I'm telling you we already put parellels in Episode Connections. So what would be the point?

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • I didn't see any parallels in  Episode Conection so I didn't know that 

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • I'm not saying we have parallels everywhere x) Just saying that for now we put them under Episode Connections. For exemple, on The Dark Swan page, we have:

      "When Henry first meets Emma as the Dark One, he tells her, "Mom? What happened to you?" His father, Baelfire, asked his own father the same thing, when the latter had just became the Dark One in "Desperate Souls"."

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Oh okay, thanks :)

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • I suggest we create a page for the 1939 film, "The Wizard of Oz". The show draws much visuals from this film, notably with Zelena in regards to the green skin and broomstick.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • M.J. Daniels wrote:
      I suggest we create a page for the 1939 film, "The Wizard of Oz". The show draws much visuals from this film, notably with Zelena in regards to the green skin and broomstick.

      It gets tricky if we do this, because so far we only have pages for the original stories, and the Disney films (if relevant). This would open the floodgates to allowing pages for many adaptations of the stories to get a page. At the same time though, you are correct, there are several things that are pulled from the movie, and not the book, including Zelena's skin, her broom, her outfit, and references to Oz being over the rainbow, and the ruby slippers.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • M.J. Daniels wrote:
      I suggest we create a page for the 1939 film, "The Wizard of Oz". The show draws much visuals from this film, notably with Zelena in regards to the green skin and broomstick.

      If any film should have a page it's " Oz the great and powerful". The show draws the visuals from there.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Farerb wrote:
      M.J. Daniels wrote:
      I suggest we create a page for the 1939 film, "The Wizard of Oz". The show draws much visuals from this film, notably with Zelena in regards to the green skin and broomstick.
      If any film should have a page it's " Oz the great and powerful". The show draws the visuals from there.

      Except that film draws from the visuals of the 1939 film, so the page we would make would be for the 1939 film.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Having a page for a film that they don't have the right to use (they never had), I'd have a problem with that x)

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Lady Junky wrote:
      Having a page for a film that they don't have the right to use (they never had), I'd have a problem with that x)

      Well, they may not have rights, but you can't deny they are referenceing it with certain things that they legally can do.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • CoolDudeAl wrote:
      Lady Junky wrote:
      Having a page for a film that they don't have the right to use (they never had), I'd have a problem with that x)
      Well, they may not have rights, but you can't deny they are referenceing it with certain things that they legally can do.

      Sure, but in our case, most of the elements could also be references to "Oz the great and powerful" as Farerb said.

      So I'd say no page for a Oz-film for now and we wait 5B and their new elements.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Lady Junky wrote:
      CoolDudeAl wrote:
      Lady Junky wrote:
      Having a page for a film that they don't have the right to use (they never had), I'd have a problem with that x)
      Well, they may not have rights, but you can't deny they are referenceing it with certain things that they legally can do.
      Sure, but in our case, most of the elements could also be references to "Oz the great and powerful" as Farerb said.

      So I'd say no page for a Oz-film for now and we wait 5B and their new elements.

      I agree with that. Honestly, I think it is too messy to do anyway, because like I said, if we add either of those in, it opens up the floodgates to hundreds of adaptations.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • I suggest that we add a category for people who died and came back. like Rumple, Charming, Daniel, Gerhardt and more characters

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • 123a123 wrote:
      I suggest that we add a category for people who died and came back. like Rumple, Charming, Daniel, Gerhardt and more characters

      Disagree. I think the List of Deaths page already covers who died and came back, and having a category for it would not add much. 

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • There are characters like Charming and Rumple who died and came back

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • I'd like to suggest a list page for official merchandise. (Like the stuff abc sells through cafepress and hot topic. And the funko pop figures and trading cards) i own the majority of this stuff and could provide high quality photos.

      I'd keep it to just official stuff, however, to avoid issues and to avoid having a huge list XD

      We could also consider including a section on some of the props that one can buy a replica of from the vendor.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • And I don't mean listing every single item, just an overview XD

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • I have absolutely zero knowledge about merchandise. I'd like to see this page :P

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • I'll sandbox up a basic example XD

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Oh, I meant I would like to see the page due to my lack of knowledge, as I think I could learn from it, not in a show-me-first-and-then-I'll-vote way xD But sure!

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • I say we make a Hades' lair page.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • I mean, the basement of the library (or whatever it is in the Underworld)...

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Onceuponfan123 wrote:
      I say we make a Hades' lair page.

      I agree

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • I suggest we make a "List of Vehicles" page

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • It's too minor... there are only four!

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Could we make an Olympian Crystal page?

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • I agree

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • How about a Dark Grail page? Is it too minor?

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • I think that there would have to be.  It was a major plot device for the finale, kinda like the trigger was for the season 2 finale.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • So can I make it?

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Maybe we should create a template for people who were under a sleeping curse? we already have 7 if not more

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Go for it Onceuponfan123

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Is the Dark Grail supposed to be the same grail Henry used to absorb the Olympian Crystal? 

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Applegirl wrote: Is the Dark Grail supposed to be the same grail Henry used to absorb the Olympian Crystal? 

      Yes, definitely.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Nightlily wrote:

      Applegirl wrote: Is the Dark Grail supposed to be the same grail Henry used to absorb the Olympian Crystal? 

      Yes, definitely.

      I'm not sure a separate page is needed. My suggestion is to rename the page Holy Grail to Holy Grails.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Applegirl wrote:
      Nightlily wrote:

      Applegirl wrote: Is the Dark Grail supposed to be the same grail Henry used to absorb the Olympian Crystal? 

      Yes, definitely.
      I'm not sure a separate page is needed. My suggestion is to rename the page Holy Grail to Holy Grails.

      Except the second Grail has never been named "Holy".

      To me, it would be a mistake to rename the current page to Holy Grails, especially because the power of the two items are very different. Similar items, yes but only in appearance. Their powers are different and opposed.

      Should get a new page if it has to.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • ^ I guess it couldn't hurt to make a new page, particularly if the two grails have different powers. Violet did call the second one the Holy Grail as well, but I'll vote towards the new page because it's not really been explained if both grails come from the same power source or something, and that would look confusing in the page summaries.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Personally, I think "Holy Grails" sounds a bit weird. I think a separate page would be better.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Applegirl wrote:
      ^ I guess it couldn't hurt to make a new page, particularly if the two grails have different powers. Violet did call the second one the Holy Grail as well, but I'll vote towards the new page because it's not really been explained if both grails come from the same power source or something, and that would look confusing in the page summaries.


      Actually, Violet never called it "Holy Grail" ^^

      She just said that her tutor used to show her paitings of the Holy Grail. And when Henry mentions that the Holy Grail became Excalibur, Violet says: "No, the Grail was always silver, but... this looks kind of like it... it... its twin." So, she clearly immediatly understood that it was not the Holy Grail ^^

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • ^ Okay, then I was misremembering her exact words. Nevermind. XD I agree with having the Dark Grail page. 

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • If it's a polar opposite to the Holy Grail, doesn't that make it the Unholy Grail? XD

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • I don't know if there is one, but I haven't been able to find a page or entry on the List of Minor Items for the sword Gideon will use to kill Emma. Is there a page/entry? If not, I think we should create one. It has appeared in a few episodes and items that have appeared in one episode (such as the Enchanted Harpoon or Hephaestus' Hammer) have an entry in the List of Minor Items

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • ^I think that item deserves its own page

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Edzz wrote: ^I think that item deserves its own page

      I totally agree with you. I was just asking if we had a page/entry, and if not, we should make one. Then, if the community does agree we should make a page for the sword, it brings up some controversial questions, such as: What do we call the Sword? (Gideon's Sword? Enchanted Sword? Magic Sword?) or Where is its origin? (Do we leave it unknown or say it's from Storybrooke?)

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Anybody else want to contribute in their 2 cents?

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • I personally agree. And by the way, you don't need a community consensus to create a new page as long as it follows the established format and is consistent with the other pages :-)

      It is always good to ask here first to see what others think, but you can go ahead and created even if you get few or zero answers.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Oh. Okay. Thanks. What should I call the page?

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Hmmm, I really don't know. Magic Sword is too ambiguous, but it's the best option I can think of. We don't know if it is Enchanted, and it is not Gideon's. We might get a canon name later on, then we can rename it.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • OKay.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Can we have a Caregory for characters that use magic?

      I would make it so much easier to find that info.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    •   Preparing Editor Spell
    • Anyone else want to chip in?

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Eddiefunny wrote:
      Anyone else want to chip in?

      disagree too

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Why is Alice's daughter in the List of minor characters?

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Slipper Blue wrote:
      Why is Alice's daughter in the List of minor characters?

      Because she is a minor character.

      Alice from OUATIW.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Eskaver wrote:
      Slipper Blue wrote:
      Why is Alice's daughter in the List of minor characters?
      Because she is a minor character.

      Alice from OUATIW.

      I don't agree. She is the daughter of the main character of the series (OUATIW).

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • I have two suggestions:

      1) A category: "Victims of the Sleeping Curse"

      2) A category "Caves" (I realised we have Fiery Cave, Medusa's Cave, Mal's Cave, Bae's Cave, Cave of Wonders, Echo Caves, perhaps I'm missing others

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • FrancisPaul wrote:
      I have two suggestions:

      1) A category: "Victims of the Sleeping Curse"

      2) A category "Caves" (I realised we have Fiery Cave, Medusa's Cave, Mal's Cave, Bae's Cave, Cave of Wonders, Echo Caves, perhaps I'm missing others


      Disagree with the first one. Don't see why we should do it? I mean why victims of that curse and not the others? Plus, it'd be all SB. Let's stay with our format.

      Agree with the second one.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • agree with 2nd only

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Is the Wicked Witch of the North (the one that cursed the Tin Man) included in the List of Minor Characters?

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • FrancisPaul wrote:
      I have two suggestions:

      1) A category: "Victims of the Sleeping Curse"

      2) A category "Caves" (I realised we have Fiery Cave, Medusa's Cave, Mal's Cave, Bae's Cave, Cave of Wonders, Echo Caves, perhaps I'm missing others

      Agree with the second one.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Pallid wrote:
      FrancisPaul wrote:
      I have two suggestions:

      1) A category: "Victims of the Sleeping Curse"

      2) A category "Caves" (I realised we have Fiery Cave, Medusa's Cave, Mal's Cave, Bae's Cave, Cave of Wonders, Echo Caves, perhaps I'm missing others

      Agree with the second one.

      I already created it http://onceuponatime.wikia.com/wiki/Category:Caves

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • One question :Should there be a page that contains info in regards about "Ghosts or Spirits-Souls" that we have seen in few episodes of Season Three,Five and Six or just put them under the section"Underworld Creatures" on List of Creatures page.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • As she is guest starring (and recurring) this season, shouldn't Yael Yurman get a page?

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Lady Rapunzel wrote:
      As she is guest starring (and recurring) this season, shouldn't Yael Yurman get a page?

      One already asked one time, and we said no. Simply because there is not enough known details about her to create a page for her :/

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Lady Junky wrote:
      Lady Rapunzel wrote:
      As she is guest starring (and recurring) this season, shouldn't Yael Yurman get a page?
      One already asked one time, and we said no. Simply because there is not enough known details about her to create a page for her :/

      Okay. :/

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Shouldn't there be gallery pages for the seasons, with all the promotional photos, posters and DVD covers? ^D

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Lady Rapunzel wrote:
      Shouldn't there be gallery pages for the seasons, with all the promotional photos, posters and DVD covers? ^D

      I think it was voted against it, last time we taked about it.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Lady Junky wrote:
      Lady Rapunzel wrote:
      Shouldn't there be gallery pages for the seasons, with all the promotional photos, posters and DVD covers? ^D
      I think it was voted against it, last time we taked about it.

      In my opinion, it would be very practical, as all the promotional material of the season released could be found in one same page.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • ^ I agree.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • I agree with LR’s suggestion.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • TheRose123 wrote:
      I agree with LR’s suggestion.

      Up 

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Lady Rapunzel wrote:
      TheRose123 wrote:
      I agree with LR’s suggestion.
      Up 

      I agree with Lady Rapunzel's suggestion.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Lila129 wrote:
      Lady Rapunzel wrote:
      TheRose123 wrote:
      I agree with LR’s suggestion.
      Up 
      I agree with Lady Rapunzel's suggestion.

      So that's four, Me, Bot, TheRose, and Lila.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • sure, i agree

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Gusey1397 wrote:
      sure, i agree

      That's 5. Consensus?

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Up.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • I've just a got a look at the Policies, and it says: "Please note that the five vote consensus applies only to infobox image and quote changes, not to major updates to an article's content.". So i suppose this counts as a major update..?

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • I don't disagree, so count me as a yes.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Let's talk about the format of these season galleries.

      I think it would make sense to have a section for the posters (since those are generally for a whole or half season) and then a section for episode specific images, listed in order by episode.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Bot of Solitude wrote:
      Let's talk about the format of these season galleries.

      I think it would make sense to have a section for the posters (since those are generally for a whole or half season) and then a section for episode specific images, listed in order by episode.

      Don't forget the promotional pics ^^D And perhaps DVD covers?

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Lady Rapunzel wrote:
      Bot of Solitude wrote:
      Let's talk about the format of these season galleries.

      I think it would make sense to have a section for the posters (since those are generally for a whole or half season) and then a section for episode specific images, listed in order by episode.

      Don't forget the promotional pics ^^D And perhaps DVD covers?


      DVD covers have nothing to do on a season gallery? No? They belong to the DVD page ^^

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Bot of Solitude wrote:
      Let's talk about the format of these season galleries.

      I think it would make sense to have a section for the posters (since those are generally for a whole or half season) and then a section for episode specific images, listed in order by episode.

      Do we really need to put back episode pics on this gallery? That's repetitive while they are already on episode pages... Why repeat them? And I don't see people going a season gallery to look at the promo pics for an episode :/

      I think promo pics & posters are enough for a season gallery.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Lady Junky wrote:
      Bot of Solitude wrote:
      Let's talk about the format of these season galleries.

      I think it would make sense to have a section for the posters (since those are generally for a whole or half season) and then a section for episode specific images, listed in order by episode.

      Do we really need to put back episode pics on this gallery? That's repetitive while they are already on episode pages... Why repeat them? And I don't see people going a season gallery to look at the promo pics for an episode :/

      I think promo pics & posters are enough for a season gallery.

      Yes, i agree. 

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Lady Junky wrote:
      Lady Rapunzel wrote:
      Bot of Solitude wrote:
      Let's talk about the format of these season galleries.

      I think it would make sense to have a section for the posters (since those are generally for a whole or half season) and then a section for episode specific images, listed in order by episode.

      Don't forget the promotional pics ^^D And perhaps DVD covers?

      DVD covers have nothing to do on a season gallery? No? They belong to the DVD page ^^

      In that case, shouldn't there a be a "two-counterparts" style infobox for the DVD, showing both the DVD and Blu-ray covers? ^^D

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Lady Rapunzel wrote:
      Lady Junky wrote:
      Lady Rapunzel wrote:
      Bot of Solitude wrote:
      Let's talk about the format of these season galleries.

      I think it would make sense to have a section for the posters (since those are generally for a whole or half season) and then a section for episode specific images, listed in order by episode.

      Don't forget the promotional pics ^^D And perhaps DVD covers?

      DVD covers have nothing to do on a season gallery? No? They belong to the DVD page ^^
      In that case, shouldn't there a be a "two-counterparts" style infobox for the DVD, showing both the DVD and Blu-ray covers? ^^D

      What's the point? It is the same one.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Lady Junky wrote:
      Lady Rapunzel wrote:
      Lady Junky wrote:
      Lady Rapunzel wrote:
      Bot of Solitude wrote:
      Let's talk about the format of these season galleries.

      I think it would make sense to have a section for the posters (since those are generally for a whole or half season) and then a section for episode specific images, listed in order by episode.

      Don't forget the promotional pics ^^D And perhaps DVD covers?

      DVD covers have nothing to do on a season gallery? No? They belong to the DVD page ^^
      In that case, shouldn't there a be a "two-counterparts" style infobox for the DVD, showing both the DVD and Blu-ray covers? ^^D
      What's the point? It is the same one.

      No it's not? The blu-ray has this border around it, which the DVD hasn't. ^^ https://multimedia.bbycastatic.ca/multimedia/products/500x500/m22/m2220/m2220811.jpg  

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Lady Rapunzel wrote:
      Lady Junky wrote:
      Lady Rapunzel wrote:
      Lady Junky wrote:
      Lady Rapunzel wrote:
      Bot of Solitude wrote:
      Let's talk about the format of these season galleries.

      I think it would make sense to have a section for the posters (since those are generally for a whole or half season) and then a section for episode specific images, listed in order by episode.

      Don't forget the promotional pics ^^D And perhaps DVD covers?

      DVD covers have nothing to do on a season gallery? No? They belong to the DVD page ^^
      In that case, shouldn't there a be a "two-counterparts" style infobox for the DVD, showing both the DVD and Blu-ray covers? ^^D
      What's the point? It is the same one.
      No it's not? The blu-ray has this border around it, which the DVD hasn't. ^^ https://multimedia.bbycastatic.ca/multimedia/products/500x500/m22/m2220/m2220811.jpg


      ... It is the same one. The border is the same on all Blu-rays, not just OUAT. The cover is the pic inside the border.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Lady Junky wrote:
      Lady Rapunzel wrote:
      Lady Junky wrote:
      Lady Rapunzel wrote:
      Lady Junky wrote:
      Lady Rapunzel wrote:
      Bot of Solitude wrote:
      Let's talk about the format of these season galleries.

      I think it would make sense to have a section for the posters (since those are generally for a whole or half season) and then a section for episode specific images, listed in order by episode.

      Don't forget the promotional pics ^^D And perhaps DVD covers?

      DVD covers have nothing to do on a season gallery? No? They belong to the DVD page ^^
      In that case, shouldn't there a be a "two-counterparts" style infobox for the DVD, showing both the DVD and Blu-ray covers? ^^D
      What's the point? It is the same one.
      No it's not? The blu-ray has this border around it, which the DVD hasn't. ^^ https://multimedia.bbycastatic.ca/multimedia/products/500x500/m22/m2220/m2220811.jpg


      ... It is the same one. The border is the same on all Blu-rays, not just OUAT. The cover is the pic inside the border.

      Anyways, let's go back to the "Season/Gallery" discussion.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Are we allowed to create the galleries already?

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Lady Rapunzel wrote:
      Are we allowed to create the galleries already?

      Well, no? The discussion is clearly ongoing ^^'

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Lady Junky wrote:
      Lady Rapunzel wrote:
      Are we allowed to create the galleries already?
      Well, no? The discussion is clearly ongoing ^^'

      Okay.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Category "Elements with Multiple Iterations"? Anyone agrees?

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Lady Rapunzel wrote:
      Are we allowed to create the galleries already?

      We had six votes on creating the season galleries. The discussion was ongoing and left hanging. Anyone who would agree on this?

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Lady Junky wrote:
      Bot of Solitude wrote:
      Let's talk about the format of these season galleries. I think it would make sense to have a section for the posters (since those are generally for a whole or half season) and then a section for episode specific images, listed in order by episode.
      Do we really need to put back episode pics on this gallery? That's repetitive while they are already on episode pages... Why repeat them? And I don't see people going a season gallery to look at the promo pics for an episode :/
      I think promo pics & posters are enough for a season gallery.

      I agree with this suggestion for the season galleries.


      Also, not sure if anyone suggested this yet, but do you guys think a page for the Candy Killer's heart-shaped chocolate boxes would be good or would it be too much like the Candy Killer Case page? I would suggest the page name "Heart-Shaped Chocolate Boxes".

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Applegirl wrote: Also, not sure if anyone suggested this yet, but do you guys think a page for the Candy Killer's heart-shaped chocolate boxes would be good or would it be too much like the Candy Killer Case page? I would suggest the page name "Heart-Shaped Chocolate Boxes".

      Sure, why not? The CK Case page is about the entire investigation, a page about these boxes would be more specific.

      If you feel it, we can give it a go I think ^^

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Lady Junky wrote:

      Applegirl wrote: Also, not sure if anyone suggested this yet, but do you guys think a page for the Candy Killer's heart-shaped chocolate boxes would be good or would it be too much like the Candy Killer Case page? I would suggest the page name "Heart-Shaped Chocolate Boxes".

      Sure, why not? The CK Case page is about the entire investigation, a page about these boxes would be more specific.

      If you feel it, we can give it a go I think ^^

      @Lady Junky we currently have seven votes on the season gallery pages. How many votes would we need?

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Lady Rapunzel wrote:
      Lady Junky wrote:

      Applegirl wrote: Also, not sure if anyone suggested this yet, but do you guys think a page for the Candy Killer's heart-shaped chocolate boxes would be good or would it be too much like the Candy Killer Case page? I would suggest the page name "Heart-Shaped Chocolate Boxes".

      Sure, why not? The CK Case page is about the entire investigation, a page about these boxes would be more specific.

      If you feel it, we can give it a go I think ^^

      @Lady Junky we currently have seven votes on the season gallery pages. How many votes would we need?

      .

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • I wasn't sure were to put this, but i suggest the deletion of the "Children" category. It doesn't make any sense, since, once they grow up, they are removed from the category, so, it is basically useless.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Lady Rapunzel wrote:

      Lady Junky wrote:

      Applegirl wrote: Also, not sure if anyone suggested this yet, but do you guys think a page for the Candy Killer's heart-shaped chocolate boxes would be good or would it be too much like the Candy Killer Case page? I would suggest the page name "Heart-Shaped Chocolate Boxes".

      Sure, why not? The CK Case page is about the entire investigation, a page about these boxes would be more specific.

      If you feel it, we can give it a go I think ^^

      @Lady Junky we currently have seven votes on the season gallery pages. How many votes would we need?

      I agree

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Mattestar7 wrote:

      Lady Rapunzel wrote:

      Lady Junky wrote:

      Applegirl wrote: Also, not sure if anyone suggested this yet, but do you guys think a page for the Candy Killer's heart-shaped chocolate boxes would be good or would it be too much like the Candy Killer Case page? I would suggest the page name "Heart-Shaped Chocolate Boxes".

      Sure, why not? The CK Case page is about the entire investigation, a page about these boxes would be more specific.

      If you feel it, we can give it a go I think ^^

      @Lady Junky we currently have seven votes on the season gallery pages. How many votes would we need?
      I agree

      Eight now. :) 

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Season gallery pages suggestion = 8 votes agreeing with it. Anyone else to share their opinions about it? (Here's the concept of it):  A gallery for each season of the show that contains the posters & promo pics (promotional material in general). 

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Lady Rapunzel wrote:
      Season gallery pages suggestion = 8 votes agreeing with it. Anyone else to share their opinions about it? (Here's the concept of it): 

      A gallery for each season of the show that contains the posters & promo pics (promotional material in general). 

      Anyone else to share their opinions about this? And, Lady, how much votes is it enough ?

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Lady Rapunzel wrote:

      Lady Rapunzel wrote:
      Season gallery pages suggestion = 8 votes agreeing with it. Anyone else to share their opinions about it? (Here's the concept of it): 

      A gallery for each season of the show that contains the posters & promo pics (promotional material in general). 

      Anyone else to share their opinions about this? And, Lady, how much votes is it enough ?

      Agree

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Lady Rapunzel wrote: Season gallery pages suggestion = 8 votes agreeing with it. Anyone else to share their opinions about it? (Here's the concept of it):  A gallery for each season of the show that contains the posters & promo pics (promotional material in general). 

      9 votes.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • What do you guys think about "Season Premieres" and "Season Finales" categories?

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • FrancisPaul wrote: What do you guys think about "Season Premieres" and "Season Finales" categories?

      I'm fine with that.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • FrancisPaul wrote:
      What do you guys think about "Season Premieres" and "Season Finales" categories?

      Agree too

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Lady Rapunzel wrote:

      Lady Rapunzel wrote: Season gallery pages suggestion = 8 votes agreeing with it. Anyone else to share their opinions about it? (Here's the concept of it):  A gallery for each season of the show that contains the posters & promo pics (promotional material in general). 

      9 votes.

      Anyone else? =) 

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • FrancisPaul wrote:
      What do you guys think about "Season Premieres" and "Season Finales" categories?

      I kind of disagree, because i don't really see the point of it.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Isn’t there any reason Yael Yurman doesn’t have a page? She seems pretty important and has double the appearances of Alex Zahara who has a page

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Schroeswald wrote: Isn’t there any reason Yael Yurman doesn’t have a page? She seems pretty important and has double the appearances of Alex Zahara who has a page

      Not enough information about her. Her case was discussed.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Lady Rapunzel wrote:

      Lady Rapunzel wrote: Season gallery pages suggestion = 8 votes agreeing with it. Anyone else to share their opinions about it? (Here's the concept of it):  A gallery for each season of the show that contains the posters & promo pics (promotional material in general). 

      9 votes.

      We have nine votes. Anyone else wanna chime in?

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Lady Rapunzel wrote: I wasn't sure were to put this, but i suggest the deletion of the "Children" category. It doesn't make any sense, since, once they grow up, they are removed from the category, so, it is basically useless.

      Yup, agree with this.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • I think that Floyd deserves a page, yes I do realize Lily just made it but I think it'd be best to put it into consensus, he appears so much that it overrides his minor status in my opinion (he is the twentieth most appearing character).

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Schroeswald wrote: I think that Floyd deserves a page, yes I do realize Lily just made it but I think it'd be best to put it into consensus, he appears so much that it overrides his minor status in my opinion (he is the twentieth most appearing character).

      Agree. He appeared waaay too many times not to get a page.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • S said it purr-fectly ;-)

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Nick Branson wrote:

      Lady Rapunzel wrote:

      Lady Rapunzel wrote: Season gallery pages suggestion = 8 votes agreeing with it. Anyone else to share their opinions about it? (Here's the concept of it):  A gallery for each season of the show that contains the posters & promo pics (promotional material in general). 

      9 votes.
      We have nine votes. Anyone else wanna chime in?

      Agree and I think this is a consensus.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • I think we should have a gallery for the Lost Boys. We have one for fairies.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Lola987 wrote: I think we should have a gallery for the Lost Boys. We have one for fairies.

      Agree

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • I suggest we make a page for Cindy Luna.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Nick Branson wrote: I suggest we make a page for Cindy Luna.

      She is definitely important enough, but I think the reason why she doesn't have a page is that there is hardly any info on her. When I google her, I only find info on the titles she's been in. Nothing on her background, no biographical info.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Nick Branson wrote:

      Lola987 wrote: I think we should have a gallery for the Lost Boys. We have one for fairies.

      Agree

      Agreed I don’t see why we haven’t had one.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • I think it might be nice to have Starring Cast, Guest Cast, Special Guest Cast and Co-Starring Cast catégories for the actor pages to make it easier to find every guest star or co-star without going through every cast page, (the starring and special guest starring are mostly there for consistency).

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • ^Agree.

        Preparing