FANDOM

A Spy in the Mirror
  Preparing Editor Spell
  • Fareb seems to have it wrong. I did not call him a misogynist because we disagree over Killian/CS, I called him one because he made a sexist accusation that I (a woman) only like Hook because I am attracted to him (despite the fact that I am not attracted in any way to Hook or men in general). Which is very misogynistic as it reduces women to their vaginas and states that women cannot thnk rationally around attractive men.

    It also invalidated my sexuality as an aroace.

    I admit that the "woman hater" bit was too far, but if I am disrespectful for calling out his sexism, is he not disrespectful for being sexist?

      Preparing Editor Spell
    • He didn't accuse you of that as I remember. Nevertheless, name-calling isn't right in any case. 

      But all of that is in the past, let's move forward.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • He did. He said "Regina is not a hot dude so she doesn't get a free pass". If name calling is not OK in your books, slut shaming should not be either.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Aine1989 wrote:
      He did. He said "Regina is not a hot dude so she doesn't get a free pass".

      If name calling is not OK in your books, slut shaming should not be either.

      That's a misunderstanding of sarcasm, not anything else. Nonetheless, the issue has passed. 

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • A Spy in the Mirror
        Preparing Editor Spell
  • I'm letting you know that I've been called women hater in here http://onceuponatime.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:256605#216 which is disrespectful towards me, if she has to disrespect people just because of a fictional character, then she should check her priorities.

    I'm letting you know because I don't want to be dragged into nonsensical fights anymore, I'd appreciate if you do something about it.

    Thank you

      Preparing Editor Spell
    • Thank you, 

      I've decided to close the thread and open up a separate one that will continue to abide by the forum rules and be more "on-topic" with that issue.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Eskaver wrote:
      Thank you, 

      I've decided to close the thread and open up a separate one that will continue to abide by the forum rules and be more "on-topic" with that issue.

      It's funny that I was writing a reply the second you closed it and it took me quite some time to realise why the page wasn't loading XD

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • FrancisPaul wrote:
      Eskaver wrote:
      Thank you, 

      I've decided to close the thread and open up a separate one that will continue to abide by the forum rules and be more "on-topic" with that issue.

      It's funny that I was writing a reply the second you closed it and it took me quite some time to realise why the page wasn't loading XD

      Sorry XD. Chances are all you'd see is like a dozen deleted responses if I didn't.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Eskaver wrote:
      FrancisPaul wrote:
      Eskaver wrote:
      Thank you, 

      I've decided to close the thread and open up a separate one that will continue to abide by the forum rules and be more "on-topic" with that issue.

      It's funny that I was writing a reply the second you closed it and it took me quite some time to realise why the page wasn't loading XD
      Sorry XD. Chances are all you'd see is like a dozen deleted responses if I didn't.

      Makes sense. Guess I'll post on the new thread you'll open ^^

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • A Spy in the Mirror
        Preparing Editor Spell
  • Hey! I'm looking for a post of mine but I don't remember what thread it was in. I listed a few instances in which the characters said things which were later revealed to be untrue (Lancelot's death, the darkness vs. the sorcerer, etc.) and you replied something like "most of those aren't real examples."

    Do you happen to remember which thread I'm referring to? I need it for a list page I'm working on. Thank you!

      Preparing Editor Spell
  • Can you please stop moving my threads to Q&A section as no one responds in that area and its fine in general discussion

      Preparing Editor Spell
    • It is up to the moderators' or admins' discretion on where a thread will be placed. I felt that it goes into the Q & A board because it's a question that has a relatively simple answer and generates no theory or anything otherwise. Just because you feel as though no one responds in that board is meaningless. Anyone that sees overall wiki activity can simply see it and respond to it as they wish. 

      Nevertheless, the thread will remain where it is.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • A Spy in the Mirror
        Preparing Editor Spell
  • The old topic is full.

    Can you make a new one?

      Preparing Editor Spell
  • I accidently made an anonymous comment on The song in your heart thread. Is there anyway to delete it? Thanks in advance

      Preparing Editor Spell
  • In the topic of who is the most powerful has arrived in 500 messages and now you can not post anything else because there is a limit of messages, is there anything you can do? Because I wanted to talk more and wait for the next topics to debate. thanks

      Preparing Editor Spell
  • How can I block someone or just delete my account all together thanks

      Preparing Editor Spell
    • Please see an admin (Look under the About Us tab) about it for better information. I hope that helps.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Hi Freddy,
      Only an admin can block someone, I'm afraid. About your second question: After an account has been created, it cannot be deleted, but it can be disabled - however, please note, that this means that you won't be able to use it again in the future. For further information, read this article.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • A Spy in the Mirror
        Preparing Editor Spell
  • I get why your doing it, but at the same time, if people are not mature enough to have a discussion with disagreements, they shouldn't be here. Especially when they start attacking users and other people on the internet's intellegence. Just something you might want to talk to the admins about.

      Preparing Editor Spell
    • View all 6 replies
    • Eskaver wrote:
      Thanks for your concern and vigilance. Appropriate action will be taken. Things aren't as swift as they may be because other engagements (I do sleep). I assure you that most if not every post is read and gets noticed by a moderator at a given time. Just small things (like availability) delays what otherwise would be efficient and effective.

      As a side-note, on that thread, try to remain on topic and to lessen the engagement so it can be dealt with without a whole train of posts being removed. Thanks!

      Alright, thanks. And yeah, I'll try to just not respond.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • I'm trying not to engage, but it is just spiraling out of control, and the thread is getting totally derailed. Just fyi, and sorry. I don't think any admins or mods are active right now either, which I get everybody has a life, so I'm sure you guys will take care of it when you get back. Just thought I'd leave a heads up. Also, I've had a cold this week, so I'm trying to stay calm, but it's harder when I feel blah, so sorry if I'm driving you crazy.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • A Spy in the Mirror
        Preparing Editor Spell
  • Why did you remove my first comment before CoolDude started commenting rudely at me? I didn't do anythin wrong. I was not off topic. I only relating what was similar between Charming and Merida and what might happen if it goes on. And what do you mean by saying not helping? He was the one not helping here.

      Preparing Editor Spell
    • He wasn't, however, you can't post spoilers in the General Discussion Board. I can restore your first comment but the spoilers will have to will have to be removed.

      If any description was labeled not helping, then it would be the inflammation of a rather destructive argument. The comment will be restored, edited. Please remember these rules and try not to argue with CDA.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • Eskaver wrote: He wasn't, however, you can't post spoilers in the General Discussion Board. I can restore your first comment but the spoilers will have to will have to be removed.

      If any description was labeled not helping, then it would be the inflammation of a rather destructive argument. The comment will be restored, edited. Please remember these rules and try not to argue with CDA.

      I did not post any spoilers there. Whatever you thought it was, it was not what you think. And did so speak in a rude attitude at me by telling what to or not to speculate. That was too bossy. And it hurt my feelings.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • NickyHelp wrote:

      Eskaver wrote: He wasn't, however, you can't post spoilers in the General Discussion Board. I can restore your first comment but the spoilers will have to will have to be removed.

      If any description was labeled not helping, then it would be the inflammation of a rather destructive argument. The comment will be restored, edited. Please remember these rules and try not to argue with CDA.

      I did not post any spoilers there. Whatever you thought it was, it was not what you think. And did so speak in a rude attitude at me by telling what to or not to speculate. That was too bossy. And it hurt my feelings.

      Posts concerning 6x20 in the 6x12 General Discussion thread is posting spoilers.

        Preparing Editor Spell
    • A Spy in the Mirror
        Preparing Editor Spell
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message